archaeology-orchestrator

Automates drafting archaeological excavation report discussions via a six-step pipeline.

Updated Nov 12, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/younga1234/20251112-3 --skill archaeology-orchestrator
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: archaeology-orchestrator
Source: https://github.com/younga1234/20251112-3/tree/main/.claude/skills/archaeology-orchestrator
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/younga1234/20251112-3 --skill archaeology-orchestrator

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires pandas, numpy, matplotlib, seaborn, PyPDF2, pdfplumber, olefile.

What problem does it solve?

The entire process of drafting an archaeological report's discussion section, from initial data collection to final compliance checks, is a multi-stage, complex, and extremely time-consuming endeavor. This master orchestrator automates the entire pipeline.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • End-to-End Automation: Executes a comprehensive 6-step pipeline, from data normalization to the final compliance audit, with a single, high-level command.
  • Integrated Workflow: Seamlessly passes data and outputs between specialized sub-skills, ensuring a cohesive and high-quality final report.
  • Use Case: Instead of manually running each step of report generation, simply provide your initial excavation details. This skill will manage the entire process, delivering a complete, compliant, and academically rigorous discussion section, saving weeks of work.

Quick Start

Use the archaeology-orchestrator skill to draft the discussion section for my archaeological report. Site info:

  • Name: ○○ Site
  • Institution: ○○ Cultural Heritage Research Institute
  • Period: 2024.03~2024.11
  • Coordinates: Lat 37.5665, Lon 126.9780
  • Periods: Bronze Age, Proto-Three Kingdoms
  • Main Features: 12 pit-dwellings, 34 pits
  • Main Artifacts: Plain pottery, Stone tools, Red burnished pottery

Frequently Asked Questions about archaeology-orchestrator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate writing the discussion section of an archaeological report?

Automate archaeological report discussion drafting by running a 6-step pipeline that normalizes excavation data, applies similarity-based contextualization, performs compliance checks, and generates cross-site comparisons, dating context, and final versioned outputs—eliminating weeks of manual writing.

Can I generate discussion sections that include cross-site comparisons and dating context?

Yes. The orchestrator integrates data normalization, similarity-based analysis, and regulatory compliance checks to produce discussion sections with cross-site comparisons, dating context, and archaeological significance assessment across multiple excavation records.

What input data formats does the archaeological report pipeline accept?

The pipeline accepts excavation details including site information, institution records, temporal periods, coordinates, archaeological features, and artifact catalogs; it normalizes this data and processes it through PDF and tabular formats using pandas and pdfplumber.

Do I need to run each report generation step separately, or can I automate the entire workflow?

Run the entire workflow with a single high-level command. The orchestrator executes all six pipeline stages—from data normalization to compliance audits—automatically, passing outputs between steps without manual intervention.

What compliance and quality checks does the report generation include?

The pipeline includes regulatory compliance audits, multi-section drafting, tables and appendices generation, and versioned final outputs to ensure the discussion section meets scholarly standards for excavation reports.

Can this workflow handle multiple excavation sites and comparative analysis?

Yes. The orchestrator processes multiple excavation records, performs similarity-based contextualization across sites, and produces discussion sections that synthesize cross-site comparisons and broader archaeological significance.