architect-clarify

To identify gaps in existing Architecture Decision Records, you can analyze them against MADR-like quality criteria to surface underspecified areas and prompt for focused, one-question-at-a-time clarifications that resolve ambiguity.

The best way to refine ADRs through targeted clarification questions is to enforce an interactive, one-question-at-a-time workflow that preserves the original intent while validating against project constitution constraints and cross-ADR consistency.

To ensure architectural governance alignment when updating ADRs, you validate the documents against constitution constraints and cross-ADR consistency rules, recording all changes with timestamps to maintain document hygiene.

Yes, you can validate existing ADRs against MADR-like quality standards by analyzing the documents to find ambiguities and checking for explicit decisions that align with project principles.

To start an interactive ADR clarification session in your repository, run the /architect.clarify command in the repository root to begin analyzing and refining your architecture decisions.