architect

To prevent costly rework, an architecture review surfaces design trade-offs and constraints before implementation. This systematic evaluation validates requirements, explores multiple design options, and enforces SOLID principles to guide system evolution safely.

Writing an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) for microservices requires documenting specific design options, boundary definitions, and validation checks. This process captures architectural decisions and trade-offs systematically to guide future development and evolution.

Validating architecture patterns against SOLID principles requires a phase-based evaluation that checks boundary definitions between modules. This review process ensures component constraints are respected and surfaces structural trade-offs before implementation.

This architecture review approach works for both monoliths and microservices. It systematically evaluates multi-component systems, API designs, and infrastructure patterns to guide design and enforce documentation requirements across various architectural scales.

You need to document architectural decisions with ADR templates when evaluating multi-component systems or API designs. Establishing clear boundaries and recording trade-offs early prevents costly future rework and guides long-term system evolution.

Relying on architecture patterns without formal validation risks costly future rework due to undocumented trade-offs and unclear module boundaries. A systematic review is required to surface hidden constraints and enforce SOLID principles before committing to implementation.