What problem does it solve?
Architectural decision-making often becomes slow and uncertain when teams juggle competing proposals, lack a structured ranking method, and struggle to record decisions. This Skill provides a repeatable flow that collects proposals from multiple providers, ranks them using tournament-based evaluation, and records decisions as ADRs to improve traceability.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Generate proposals from multiple LLM providers (e.g., Gemini, Codex, Grok) to surface diverse architectural options.
- Rank proposals via tournament-based evaluation to identify the strongest architectural direction.
- Refine and record decisions as Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) for governance and future reference.
- Use cases include comparing event-sourcing vs. CQRS designs, deciding between microservice patterns, and evaluating data-store strategies.
Quick Start
Run a full workflow with a problem description to generate proposals, rank them via tournament evaluation, and record the final ADR.