architect-review

To review a microservices architecture, apply governance checks across domain-driven design and clean architecture contexts to assess risks, recommend improvements with trade-offs, and document validation plans. This ensures architectural integrity and alignment with standards.

The best way to document architectural decisions is using ADR-style formats that capture goals, constraints, and trade-offs. This provides governance for architecture patterns and ensures alignment across microservices and event-driven systems.

Assess trade-offs in an event-driven architecture by gathering context, identifying risks, and providing actionable recommendations with validation documentation. This approach ensures resilience and consistency across domain-driven design boundaries.

Yes, you can review code changes against clean architecture standards by applying architectural governance to ensure consistency. The process includes context gathering, risk assessment, and recommended improvements to prevent design debt.

You need an architectural review for domain-driven design contexts when ensuring architectural integrity across complex microservices. It helps identify design debt, assess risks, and validate that system designs satisfy scalability and resilience requirements.