architecture

Document system design trade-offs by creating an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) that captures requirements analysis, evaluates architectural options, and records the rationale for the chosen decision.

An Architecture Decision Record (ADR) documents the rationale behind system design choices. You need one during new system design, major refactors, or technology selection to ensure clarity and maintainability.

Evaluate technology stack options by clarifying project requirements, assessing architectural trade-offs and pros/cons of each option, and documenting the final selection rationale using structured ADR documentation.

Yes, this structured approach applies to major refactors and technology selection processes, not just new system design. It guides requirements analysis and trade-off evaluation for any architectural decision.

Structure requirements analysis by clarifying and documenting project requirements first, then evaluating potential architectural options and their trade-offs before finalizing and documenting the chosen architecture in an ADR.

System design documentation lacks clarity when trade-offs and decision rationale are not captured. Using a structured approach with ADR documentation ensures decisions are well-documented for future maintainability.