architecture-decision-records

You document architectural decisions using Architecture Decision Records to capture context, alternatives, decisions, and consequences. This creates an auditable record that guides onboarding, governance, and future development.

The MADR-style template structures an Architecture Decision Record by defining the context, listing alternatives considered, stating the final decision, and outlining consequences to ensure clear architectural governance.

You manage an Architecture Decision Record lifecycle by transitioning its status through Proposed, Accepted, Deprecated, and Superseded states, linking related decisions to maintain an accurate audit trail.

The best way to organize ADRs across projects is storing them under a docs/adr directory and maintaining an ADR index, ensuring discoverability and traceability during architectural reviews.

You should write an Architecture Decision Record for major design choices to capture why significant architectural decisions were made, preventing knowledge loss and guiding future work.

Yes, the approach enforces governance rules by applying a standardized MADR-style template and a strict lifecycle, ensuring consistency and traceability across projects during architectural audits.