architecture-decision-records

Architecture Decision Records document technical decisions by capturing context, decision drivers, considered options, and consequences. This ensures all stakeholders understand the rationale behind significant architectural choices through a structured, standardized format.

Architecture Decision Record templates include MADR, lightweight, Y-statement, deprecation, and RFC formats. These options support comprehensive technical governance by accommodating various levels of detail and specific decision lifecycle stages.

Create an ADR when making significant technical decisions, such as adopting a new database technology or frontend framework. It records the context and consequences of architectural choices, ensuring historical clarity for all stakeholders.

Manage Architecture Decision Records by organizing them within a defined directory structure and maintaining an index. This enforces best practices for the decision-making process and documentation lifecycle throughout technical governance.

Standard Architecture Decision Records document finalized architectural choices, while RFC templates facilitate requests for comments to propose and discuss technical decisions. Both enforce documentation best practices but serve different stages of decision-making.

Yes, the lightweight Architecture Decision Record format documents smaller technical decisions effectively. It provides a structured way to capture essential context and rationale without the overhead of comprehensive templates like MADR.