architecture-decision-records

An architecture decision record (ADR) documents significant technical choices by capturing context, options considered, rationale, and consequences. You should document tradeoffs for hard-to-reverse engineering choices affecting multiple system parts that may be revisited months later.

To write an architecture decision record, apply a structured ADR template to document the context, options considered, rationale, and consequences of your database or framework choice. Use sequential file naming and concise, review-ready decision writing for long-term team reference.

The best way to track technical decisions for onboarding is creating architecture decision records that capture context, options considered, and rationale. This provides a durable, long-term reference record that makes future maintenance and team alignment much easier.

Yes, documenting architecture decisions requires a structured ADR template to ensure context, options considered, rationale, and consequences are consistently captured. Sequential file naming and concise review-ready writing are also needed for a durable long-term reference.

Yes, you can use architecture decision records for process and tooling choices, not just major architecture changes. Any significant technical decision with tradeoffs that is hard to reverse or likely to be revisited later is a candidate for an ADR.