architecture-decision

An architecture decision record (ADR) captures the problem, context, and rationale behind a system design choice so teams retain a durable history of why specific engineering trade-offs were selected.

Document architecture trade-offs by recording the alternatives considered alongside their pros, cons, and constraints, then selecting an option and noting the implementation risks in a structured decision record.

Yes, an ADR template applies to monolith versus microservices decisions by structuring the context capture, options comparison, and final decision rationale into a single durable record for team reference.

The best way to capture engineering meeting decisions is generating a structured architecture decision record that stores the problem, options compared, and final rationale in a dedicated resources directory.

Yes, this ADR approach works for technology selection scenarios by documenting the constraints, comparing the available options, and tracking the specific trade-offs that led to the final engineering decision.

You need to create an architecture decision record when your team makes significant system design choices, such as selecting a technology or structural pattern, and requires a durable ADR to track the context and trade-offs.