architecture

An ADR documents architectural decisions by capturing context, constraints, alternatives, and rationale. You need ADRs when facing major design choices, such as deciding between monolith and microservices, to communicate outcomes clearly.

To write an ADR for system design, use a standardized template to capture requirements, evaluate trade-offs between alternatives, and document the final decision rationale. This enforces consistent architecture conversations across the team.

Yes, this ADR framework guides trade-off evaluation for monolith vs microservices decisions. It enforces templates to document alternatives, constraints, and rationale, standardizing architecture conversations across software projects.

The best way to standardize architecture decision workflows is to enforce ADR templates that capture requirements and rationale. This framework guides pattern selection and ensures consistent communication of constraints and alternatives.

You should not use an ADR-driven approach for minor implementation details that lack significant trade-offs. ADRs are designed for major architectural decisions where documenting constraints, alternatives, and rationale provides ongoing project value.