architecture-review

Architecture review automates multi-perspective assessment by engaging all team members (Security, Performance, Domain Experts) to review from their unique viewpoints, then synthesizes individual findings into a consolidated report with executive summary, collaborative discussion, and prioritized recommendations.

Yes, architecture review applies to versioned targets, feature branches, or individual components. Trigger a review for a specific version (e.g., version 2.0.0) to get a holistic assessment of that release's health, strengths, and concerns.

Pragmatic mode integrates a Pragmatic Enforcer to challenge over-engineering and flag unnecessary complexity. Enable it when you want realistic, implementation-focused recommendations balanced against ideal architecture.

Yes, architecture review loads team configuration from .architecture/members.yml. Define your review team members and their roles (e.g., Security Lead, Performance Expert) before initiating a review to ensure all perspectives are included.

Architecture review analyzes your codebase using Read, Glob, Grep, and Git history to identify technical debt, coordination gaps, and system concerns. It synthesizes findings from all team members into a final document with actionable recommendations.

A detailed review document containing an executive summary, individual member findings organized by perspective, collaborative discussion, and prioritized recommendations addressing strengths, concerns, and next steps for your system.