architecture

Evaluate software architecture decisions using The Guild's multi-agent framework.

7|3|Updated Dec 1, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yzavyas/claude-1337 --skill architecture-yzavyas
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: architecture
Source: https://github.com/yzavyas/claude-1337/tree/main/plugins/arch-guild/skills/architecture
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yzavyas/claude-1337 --skill architecture-yzavyas

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps teams evaluate complex software architectures by applying The Guild's multi-agent reasoning framework to surface architectural risks, trade-offs, and design opportunities.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Guild-based architectural review: brings orthogonal perspectives from Masters and Specialists to assess system design.
  • Boundary and pattern evaluation: checks for clean boundaries, hexagonal architecture fit, and event-driven patterns.
  • Co-design and scaffolding: aids in scaffolding new services and coordinating agents for architecture decisions.
  • Use Case: imagine you are assessing a microservices platform; it surfaces questions about data ownership, boundaries, event design, and resilience.

Quick Start

Invoke architecture review on your system by describing the domain, current architecture, and desired outcomes, and ask the Guild to provide a comprehensive evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions about architecture

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate software architecture risks and trade-offs in a distributed system?

System design reviews assess architectural boundaries and event-driven patterns to surface risks. The Guild's multi-agent framework applies orthogonal perspectives from Masters and Specialists to validate trade-offs in distributed systems and hexagonal architectures.

What is the best way to review hexagonal architecture fit for a microservices platform?

Reviewing hexagonal architecture fit involves checking for clean boundaries and domain separation in your microservices platform. A multi-agent evaluation framework surfaces questions about data ownership, event design, and resilience to produce actionable validation criteria for final decisions.

How do I scaffold new services and coordinate multi-agent architecture decisions?

Scaffolding new services with multi-agent coordination requires defining domain boundaries and asynchronous patterns. The Guild framework brings Specialist perspectives to assess event design and service interactions, yielding actionable architectural criteria for final decisions.

Does this architecture review approach work for event-driven patterns and asynchronous systems?

Architecture review for event-driven patterns evaluates asynchronous communication flows and boundary definitions. The Guild's multi-agent reasoning applies Ixian validation criteria to check event design, resilience, and coordination across distributed system domains.

When should I use a multi-agent framework for system design evaluation instead of a standard review?

Use a multi-agent framework for system design evaluation when your architecture involves complex trade-offs across distributed domains, event-driven patterns, or hexagonal boundaries. It surfaces orthogonal perspectives from Masters and Specialists that standard reviews might miss, producing actionable validation criteria.