argument-audit

Map and audit academic paper arguments by extracting claims, premises, and inferences.

Updated Oct 17, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mrilikecoding/dotfiles --skill argument-audit
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: argument-audit
Source: https://github.com/mrilikecoding/dotfiles/tree/main/home/.claude/skills/argument-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mrilikecoding/dotfiles --skill argument-audit

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps users meticulously analyze and audit the logical structure of academic papers, identifying weaknesses, gaps, and inconsistencies in arguments.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Argument Mapping: Visually represent the flow of claims, premises, and inferences.
  • Logical Weakness Identification: Detect fallacies, unsupported claims, and hidden assumptions.
  • Consistency Checking: Ensure internal coherence across the entire document, from abstract to conclusion.
  • Use Case: When you need to rigorously evaluate a research paper's methodology, ensure its conclusions are soundly supported, or identify areas for improvement in scholarly writing.

Quick Start

Use the argument-audit skill to map and audit the logical structure of the attached paper titled 'Quantum Entanglement in Macroscopic Systems'.

Frequently Asked Questions about argument-audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit the logical structure of an academic paper?

Auditing an academic paper involves mapping its claims, premises, and inferences to identify logical weaknesses and inconsistencies. This Skill extracts arguments to detect unsupported claims, hidden assumptions, and scope overreach within the document.

How do I identify hidden assumptions and unsupported claims in research writing?

Identifying hidden assumptions in research writing requires analyzing evidence-claim alignment and inference validity. By mapping the argument structure, you can detect unsupported claims, missing counterarguments, and logical gaps within the text.

Can I check the internal consistency and logical coherence of a scholarly document?

Yes, you can check internal consistency by mapping the argument flow from abstract to conclusion. This analysis ensures logical coherence by identifying inconsistencies, missing counterarguments, and scope overreach across the entire academic document.

What is argument mapping and how does it evaluate research methodology?

Argument mapping visually represents the flow of claims, premises, and inferences within a paper. It evaluates research methodology by analyzing evidence-claim alignment and inference validity to ensure conclusions are soundly supported.

Do I need web search tools to evaluate premise validity in academic writing?

Yes, evaluating premise validity requires tools for reading, grepping, globbing, and web searching. Web search tools are necessary to fetch external information and properly evaluate the evidence supporting the paper's claims.