argument-auditor

To check academic writing for logical gaps, paste your paragraph or section as a single argument unit. The system audits the claim-evidence-inference chain using the Toulmin model to identify unsupported claims and missing warrants, producing targeted fix suggestions.

The Toulmin model extracts academic arguments into claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal components. Applying it to research criticism reveals whether your evidence explicitly supports the stated thesis through valid inferences.

Yes, you can audit multiple paragraphs. The system evaluates whether their relationships, such as parallel, recursive, procedural, turning, or summing, actually support the section-level thesis by checking the multi-paragraph argument progression.

Yes, the argumentation checker identifies irrelevant citations and circular reasoning. It diagnoses text across seven categories including unclear claims, insufficient evidence, logical gaps, overgeneralization, and straw man arguments.

No, the logic review explicitly filters out citation formatting and language grammar concerns. It focuses exclusively on academic reasoning, evidence sufficiency, and the validity of the inference chain.

The best way to review a theoretical framework for overgeneralization is to run a logic diagnosis on the text. The system checks for overgeneralization, straw man arguments, and circular reasoning within academic argument units.