skills.rest
cris-m
cris-mCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

argument-mapping

Map argument structure by identifying conclusions, premises, hidden premises, and fallacies.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
Search Tags:#logic#debate#analyze#critical-thinking#fallacies#argument#persuasive-content
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cris-m/flopsy --skill argument-mapping-cris-m
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: argument-mapping
Source: https://github.com/cris-m/flopsy/tree/main/src/team/templates/skills/argument-mapping
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cris-m/flopsy --skill argument-mapping-cris-m

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Decompose and evaluate persuasive arguments by clearly identifying the conclusion, explicit premises, hidden premises, and potential fallacies, enabling sharper critique and reasoning.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Conclusion & Premises Extraction: Identify the main claim and the supporting reasons, both stated and implied.
  • Hidden Premise Detection: Reveal unstated assumptions that undergird the argument.
  • Fallacy Identification: Flag common reasoning errors (e.g., ad hominem, straw man, false dichotomy) and explain their impact.
  • Use Case: Analyze political speeches, op-eds, debates, or marketing pitches to assess logical strength.

Quick Start

Provide the argument text and request a full argument map with conclusion, premises, hidden premises, and fallacies.

Frequently Asked Questions about argument-mapping

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I analyze an argument for logical fallacies and hidden premises?▼

To analyze an argument for fallacies and hidden premises, provide the persuasive text to extract the stated conclusion, explicit premises, and unstated assumptions, then flag reasoning errors like ad hominem or straw man to assess logical strength.

What is argument mapping and how does it evaluate persuasive content?▼

Argument mapping is the process of decomposing persuasive content by identifying its conclusion, explicit premises, hidden premises, and inference chain to reveal logical biases and evaluate the overall validity of the argument.

Can I use critical thinking analysis on political speeches and op-eds?▼

Yes, you can apply critical thinking analysis to political speeches, op-eds, debates, or marketing pitches to deconstruct the argument structure, detect fallacies, and evaluate the validity and strength of the persuasive reasoning.

How do I identify hidden assumptions in a debate?▼

Identify hidden assumptions in a debate by mapping the explicit premises against the stated conclusion, revealing the unstated logical bridges required for the inference chain to hold true and exposing potential biases.

What is the best way to break down an argument's inference chain?▼

The best way to break down an argument's inference chain is to extract the main claim and supporting reasons, map how explicit and hidden premises connect to the conclusion, and flag any fallacies disrupting the logical flow.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
patricksavallepatricksavalle
3

fallacy-bias-and-manipulation-analysis

Analyze natural-language text for logical fallacies, cognitive biases, and rhetorical manipulation.

Community
Advanced
sandraschisandraschi
18

logic-and-argumentation-specialist

Evaluate logical arguments for validity, soundness, and fallacies.

Community
Advanced
xcrrrxcrrr
4

summarizer

Summarize long documents into concise executive, bullet, or layered summaries.

Community
Intermediate
THUYRanTHUYRan
678

deductive-reasoning

Formalize legal case materials into P-F-C chains with validity assessments.

Community
Advanced