Verify implementation quality against QA requests and enforce evidence tracing.
npx skills add https://github.com/toongri/oh-my-toong-playground --skill argus-toongri
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: argus Source: https://github.com/toongri/oh-my-toong-playground/tree/main/skills/qa Command: npx skills add https://github.com/toongri/oh-my-toong-playground --skill argus-toongri
Prevents faulty implementations from being accepted by enforcing a structured QA verification process that matches specs, checks evidence, and ensures no hidden issues slip through.
Ask Argus to inspect the QA request, read the changed files, and confirm every trigger and evidence requirement is satisfied.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To enforce spec compliance and prevent shipping faulty code, use a structured QA verification process that maps code changes to automated checks, validates evidence, and flags deviations from the QA protocol before approval.
Evidence tracking in code review uses changed-file scopes, executed commands, and explicit file paths for every command output, creating a reliable audit trail that confirms all QA verification requirements are satisfied.
Automated checks for QA scenarios are set up by mapping composable verification triggers to specific code changes, scheduling hands-on spec validation, and enforcing evidence tracing across the affected files.
No external dependencies are required to run this QA workflow, as it operates independently to detect required verification layers, schedule automated checks, and enforce evidence tracing across the listed files.
An automated QA protocol should be used when code changes require composable verification triggers, spec compliance review, and strict evidence tracking to ensure no hidden implementation issues slip through.
Code review processes miss hidden deviations when they lack structured QA verification that enforces evidence discipline, maps triggers to automated checks, and explicitly validates changed files against the original specification.
yzhao062Ingest NSF solicitation text into a normalized requirements baseline.
tkerseyConfirm validation signals, summarize proof, and open a non-merged PR via gh.
jaehun0630Dispatch isolated subagents per task with two-stage spec and quality reviews.
insightwavesmithAnalyze code changes to identify those meeting evidence-shape-check criteria.
