What problem does it solve?
After experiments finish, researchers often over-claim what their results support. This Skill objectively judges whether experimental results actually back the intended claim, identifies missing evidence, and routes the project to the right next step (pivot, supplement, or confirm) before paper writing begins.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Result Collection: Gathers experiment data from W&B runs, EXPERIMENT_LOG.md, EXPERIMENT_TRACKER.md, training logs, and research contracts.
- Codex-Based Judgment: Sends results to Codex MCP for an objective verdict (yes/partial/no) on claim support, with confidence levels and suggested claim revisions.
- Automatic Routing: Based on the verdict, records postmortems, updates claims, triggers ablation planning, or recommends pivoting to new ideas; optionally updates a research wiki with experiment-claim edges.
- Use Case: After training runs complete on three datasets, invoke this Skill to check whether the results support the paper's central claim before drafting the experiments section.
Quick Start
Run the result-to-claim gate on my latest W&B run to judge whether the results support my intended claim.