skills.rest
AppsVortex
AppsVortexOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

arn-code-feature-spec-teams

Facilitate structured multi-agent debates to produce comprehensive feature specifications.

31|3|Updated Apr 3, 2026
Search Tags:#architecture#multi-agent#debate#claude-code#feature-spec#agent-teams
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AppsVortex/arness --skill arn-code-feature-spec-teams
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: arn-code-feature-spec-teams
Source: https://github.com/AppsVortex/arness/tree/main/plugins/arn-code/skills/arn-code-feature-spec-teams
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AppsVortex/arness --skill arn-code-feature-spec-teams

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill enables structured, multi-agent debates among architects, UX specialists, and security experts to collaboratively craft comprehensive feature specifications before implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Supports agent-team collaboration to propose, critique, and revise feature ideas
  • Guides teams through a four-round debate (propose, critique, revise, resolve) to converge on a robust spec
  • Works with existing code patterns, design systems, and security considerations to surface trade-offs and align on implementation plans
  • Provides optional greenfield context support when no prior feature files exist

Quick Start

Prompt Claude Code to initiate arn-code-feature-spec-teams to run a greenfield multi-agent debate and generate a complete feature specification.

Frequently Asked Questions about arn-code-feature-spec-teams

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use multi-agent debates to generate feature specifications in Claude Code?▼

Multi-agent debates generate feature specifications by routing architecture, UX, and security considerations through a four-round protocol of proposing, critiquing, revising, and resolving to converge on a robust implementation plan.

What is the best way to align architects and security experts on a complex feature spec?▼

Aligning architects and security experts on a feature spec requires a structured debate protocol where specialized agents critique and revise proposed ideas, surfacing trade-offs to converge on a comprehensive specification.

Can I run a feature spec debate for greenfield projects with no existing code patterns?▼

Feature spec debates support greenfield contexts by enabling agent teams to collaboratively propose and resolve architecture and UI decisions when no prior feature files or design patterns exist.

How does the four-round debate protocol work for feature specification?▼

The four-round debate protocol works by having agent teams sequentially propose initial specs, critique architectural and security flaws, revise based on feedback, and resolve to produce a final specification.

Do I need Agent Teams enabled to coordinate multi-agent feature spec generation?▼

You need Agent Teams enabled to coordinate multi-agent feature spec generation, as the structured debate protocol relies on multiple specialized agents collaborating to evaluate UI, architecture, and security trade-offs.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
danielshmayaidanielshmayai

agents

Coordinate multi-agent Claude workflows for task decomposition and parallel execution.

Community
Advanced
glwrglwr
1

frontend

Build UI components from feature specs across React, Vue, or Svelte projects.

Community
Advanced
peancharoenpeancharoen

speckit.clarify

Generate targeted clarification questions for feature specification files.

Community
Advanced
rysweetrysweet

debate-workflow

Facilitate structured multi-perspective debates for architectural decisions.

Community
Advanced