arrive-cfu

Generate 3-5 CFU questions categorized by Why, What-If, and How for ARRIVE advances.

Updated Feb 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/srswart/good-control --skill arrive-cfu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: arrive-cfu
Source: https://github.com/srswart/good-control/tree/main/.cursor/skills/arrive-cfu
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/srswart/good-control --skill arrive-cfu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Streamlines governance reviews by generating targeted Check for Understanding questions that probe rationale, risk, and verification of ARRIVE advances.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Generates 3-5 CFU questions categorized by Why, What-If, and How to surface architectural and risk considerations.
  • Tailors prompts to the specific change and documentation context, facilitating more thorough reviews.
  • Useful during PR reviews, governance meetings, or design verifications to improve review quality.

Quick Start

Run this CFU generator against the latest ARRIVE advance to produce 3-5 questions for reviewer discussion.

Frequently Asked Questions about arrive-cfu

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate check for understanding questions for governance reviews?

You generate CFU questions by running a CFU generator against the latest ARRIVE advance, which produces 3-5 targeted questions categorized by Why, What-If, and How to probe rationale, risk, and verification.

What are check for understanding questions in risk assessment and design verification?

Check for understanding questions in risk assessment are targeted prompts that probe the rationale, potential risks, and verification steps of a system change to deepen reviewer understanding of ARRIVE advances.

Can I use CFU questions to improve PR reviews for system changes?

Yes, you can use CFU questions to improve PR reviews. The generator tailors 3-5 nontrivial prompts to the specific change and documentation context, facilitating more thorough review quality during PR evaluations, governance meetings, or design verifications.

How do I structure review questions to surface architectural and risk considerations?

You structure review questions by categorizing them into Why, What-If, and How formats, which surfaces architectural and risk considerations by ensuring prompts are tailored to the specific change and include helpful hints.

When do I need to generate CFU questions for ARRIVE advances?

You need to generate CFU questions for ARRIVE advances when conducting governance reviews, risk assessments, or design verifications across system changes, streamlining the process by producing targeted questions that probe rationale and verification.

Are there limitations to using automated CFU question generation for change management?

A limitation of automated CFU question generation is that it produces a fixed set of 3-5 questions per ARRIVE advance, meaning reviewers must still manually interpret the helpful hints and nontrivial prompts during actual governance discussions.