Verified:GitHub

article-appraisal

Name: article-appraisal
Availability: InStock
Author: shaitamam-80

Performs critical-paramedical research assessment of PDFs and produces formatted output for publication review workflows.

Updated Nov 16, 2025

Search Tags:#Google Docs #structured output #pharmacology #bias assessment #evidence quality #critical appraisal #clinical articles

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/shaitamam-80/shaitamamMedAIHub --skill article-appraisal

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: article-appraisal
Source: https://github.com/shaitamam-80/shaitamamMedAIHub/tree/main/backend/app/core/skills/article-appraisal
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/shaitamam-80/shaitamamMedAIHub --skill article-appraisal

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured framework to perform critical appraisal of clinical-pharmacology papers, generating a concise Highlights section plus an 8-section narrative (Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Limitations, Funding/COI, Critical Appraisal) and a Google Docs-ready output.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured, standardized appraisal aligned with established frameworks (e.g., PICO/FINER) to assess validity, bias, and relevance.
Generates both a brief Highlights and a comprehensive narrative suitable for clinical documentation and publication.
Ideal for researchers, clinicians, and students who need reproducible, audit-ready assessments of articles.

Quick Start

To appraisal a provided clinical paper PDF, invoke the tool with the path to the PDF as specified in the SKILL.md argument-hint. The output includes the Highlights, Sections 1–8, and a Google Docs-compatible format ready for export.

Frequently Asked Questions about article-appraisal

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I perform a structured critical appraisal of a clinical pharmacology article?▼

To perform a structured critical appraisal of a clinical pharmacology article, use a framework that generates a Highlights section and an eight-section narrative evaluating bias, validity, and evidence quality. The output is formatted as a Google Docs-ready export for direct documentation.

What sections are included in a standardized clinical article appraisal?▼

A standardized clinical article appraisal includes a concise Highlights section followed by eight narrative sections: Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Limitations, Funding/COI, and Critical Appraisal. This structure ensures reproducible and audit-ready assessments of research papers.

Can I generate a Google Docs-ready appraisal directly from a clinical PDF manuscript?▼

Yes, you can generate a Google Docs-ready appraisal directly from a clinical PDF manuscript by invoking the appraisal tool with the file path. It processes the PDF and outputs structured text formatted specifically for pasting into Google Docs.

Does critical appraisal of pharmacology articles require a specific bias assessment framework?▼

Critical appraisal of pharmacology articles requires a fixed bias assessment framework, such as PICO or FINER, to ensure consistent evaluation of validity and relevance. Using a standardized framework prevents inconsistent assessments and ensures audit-ready clinical documentation.

What is the best way to format an evidence quality appraisal for clinical documentation?▼

The best way to format an evidence quality appraisal for clinical documentation is to use a structured output containing a Highlights summary and an eight-section narrative. This format enforces strict English output and produces a Google Docs-compatible structure for direct pasting.

Are there limitations when appraising clinical papers without established PICO or FINER frameworks?▼

Appraising clinical papers without established PICO or FINER frameworks risks inconsistent bias assessment and reduced evidence quality evaluation. A fixed appraisal framework is enforced to maintain consistency, meaning papers lacking clear clinical-pharmacology parameters may not fit the standardized output structure.