ase-meta-evaluate

Evaluate alternatives using a weighted multi-criteria decision matrix.

44|5|Updated Apr 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rse/ase --skill ase-meta-evaluate
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ase-meta-evaluate
Source: https://github.com/rse/ase/tree/main/plugin/skills/ase-meta-evaluate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rse/ase --skill ase-meta-evaluate

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires ase, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps users evaluate multiple alternatives by using a weighted multi-criteria decision matrix. It is useful when making comparisons or determining the best choice from a list of options.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Weighted Decision Matrix: Create a decision matrix that considers various criteria to evaluate alternatives.
  • Alternative Evaluation: Derive the reasons for evaluation, identify alternatives, and assess their uniqueness and compatibility.
  • Criteria Determination: Identify and weight criteria for evaluation to ensure a comprehensive comparison.
  • Evaluation and Rating: Evaluate each alternative against each criterion and calculate ratings.
  • Best Alternative Identification: Determine the best alternative based on the calculated ratings and provide a detailed analysis.

Quick Start

Run the ase-meta-evaluate Skill with the alternatives you want to compare and provide any additional criteria for evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions about ase-meta-evaluate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate alternatives using a weighted decision matrix?

You evaluate alternatives by running the ase-meta-evaluate Skill with your options and criteria. It uses a weighted multi-criteria decision matrix to rate each alternative and identifies the best option based on your specified weights.

What is the best way to compare multiple options with weighted criteria?

The best way to compare options is using a weighted decision matrix. This Skill identifies your alternatives, determines evaluation criteria, applies weights, and calculates ratings to provide a detailed analysis of the best choice.

How do I set up criteria weights for alternative analysis?

You set up criteria weights by providing your specific evaluation criteria when running the Skill. It identifies and applies these weights to assess the uniqueness and compatibility of each alternative within the decision matrix.

Do I need to provide my own alternatives and criteria for the evaluation?

Yes, you need to provide the alternatives you want to compare and any additional criteria for evaluation. The Skill requires this user input to derive reasons for evaluation and calculate the final ratings.

Can I use this decision matrix for software engineering alternative analysis?

Yes, you can use this decision matrix for software engineering alternative analysis. It evaluates options by identifying alternatives, determining weighted criteria, and calculating ratings to determine the best technical choice.

Why does the weighted criteria calculation require the ase dependency?

The weighted criteria calculation requires the ase dependency because the Skill utilizes the ase_decision_matrix tool to perform the underlying ratings calculation and determine the best alternative from your provided options.