ask-professor

Analyze LaTeX research papers and generate expert CV professor feedback.

1|Updated Mar 5, 2026

Search Tags:#tone #argumentation #q&a #experiments #cv #paper-review #expert-feedback

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/mobled37/claude-labs --skill ask-professor

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ask-professor
Source: https://github.com/mobled37/claude-labs/tree/main/skills/ask-professor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mobled37/claude-labs --skill ask-professor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides instant access to expert critique from a senior CV professor who has read your paper, helping you identify and fix tone, argument gaps, and strategic positioning before submission.

Core Features & Use Cases

Interactive Q&A: Real-time guidance from a veteran CV professor on your manuscript.
Comprehensive Review Angles: Tone, writing quality, argument consistency, and experimental rigor.
Use Case: Before submitting to CVPR or ICCV, run a session to surface potential reviewer concerns and recommended experiments.

Quick Start

Provide the path to your paper project and an optional question to start a Q&A session with a senior CV professor.

Frequently Asked Questions about ask-professor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I get expert feedback on my computer vision paper before submission?▼

You can get expert feedback by running an interactive Q&A session that reviews your LaTeX sources and bibliography. The session provides actionable critique on tone, argument consistency, and experimental rigor from a senior CV professor.

Can I use this to review my LaTeX manuscript for CVPR or ICCV submission?▼

Yes, you can review your LaTeX manuscript for CVPR or ICCV submission. The tool detects venue requirements and strategic positioning across sections, surfacing potential reviewer concerns and recommended experiments to improve your paper.

How do I start a Q&A session to critique the experimental rigor of my research paper?▼

To start a Q&A session, provide the path to your paper project along with an optional question. The system reads all LaTeX sources and bibliographies to detect root structure and generates concrete suggestions for experimental rigor.

What is the best way to check the tone and argument consistency of a manuscript?▼

The best way to check tone and argument consistency is through a comprehensive review session that analyzes your manuscript sections. It identifies gaps in writing quality and argument consistency, providing real-time guidance and actionable feedback.

Does this paper review tool require any specific dependencies or components?▼

No specific dependencies or components are required to use this paper review tool. You simply need to provide the file path to your paper project to initiate the expert critique and strategic positioning analysis.

Why does the feedback focus on strategic positioning across manuscript sections?▼

The feedback focuses on strategic positioning to ensure your paper meets venue requirements and addresses potential reviewer concerns. By reading all LaTeX sources, it evaluates the root structure to generate actionable, targeted suggestions.