assertion-patterns

Convert mock-based assertions into observable output verifications in tests.

2|Updated Feb 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ashaykubal/essential-agents-skills --skill assertion-patterns
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: assertion-patterns
Source: https://github.com/ashaykubal/essential-agents-skills/tree/main/skills/assertion-patterns
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ashaykubal/essential-agents-skills --skill assertion-patterns

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses tests that rely too heavily on mocks, leading to brittle tests that don't verify actual system behavior, thus providing false confidence.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Mock Transformation: Converts tests that mock the system under test or only assert on calls into tests that verify observable output.
  • Prerequisite Checks: Ensures tests import production modules and adhere to separation of concerns and naming conventions.
  • Use Case: Refactor tests flagged by test-audit to ensure they validate real functionality rather than just mock interactions.

Quick Start

Use the assertion-patterns skill to rewrite tests that mock the system under test.

Frequently Asked Questions about assertion-patterns

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I refactor tests that mock the system under test to verify real output?

Refactor mock-based tests by transforming call assertions into robust verifications of observable output. This ensures tests validate real functionality rather than just mock interactions, restoring true confidence in your test suite.

Why do mock tests provide false confidence and how can I fix them?

Mock tests provide false confidence by relying too heavily on mocks, leading to brittle tests that don't verify actual system behavior. Fix them by converting mock-based assertions to real behavior verification patterns.

What prerequisite checks are needed when refactoring mock-based assertions?

Prerequisite checks for refactoring mock-based assertions include ensuring test files import production modules, adhere to separation of concerns, and follow function naming conventions to maintain robust test integrity.

What is the best way to convert call assertions into observable output checks?

The best way to convert call assertions into observable output checks is by guiding the transformation of tests that mock the system under test, enforcing prerequisite checks, and validating real behavior.

Does this approach work with tests flagged by a test-audit for separation of concerns?

Yes, this approach works with tests flagged by a test-audit by guiding the conversion of mock-based assertions to real behavior verification patterns, ensuring separation of concerns and proper module imports.

When should I not use mock-based assertions in my test suite?

You should not use mock-based assertions when testing the system under test directly or relying solely on call assertions, as this leads to brittle tests that fail to verify actual system behavior and observable output.