assess-quality

Score LLM outputs against a rubric and output an XML verdict.

1|Updated Nov 19, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/manutej/meta-prompting-framework --skill assess-quality
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: assess-quality
Source: https://github.com/manutej/meta-prompting-framework/tree/main/skills/assess-quality
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/manutej/meta-prompting-framework --skill assess-quality

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured mechanism to evaluate LLM outputs against task requirements and decide whether iteration is needed.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Quality scoring with a numerical score (0.0-1.0) and a verdict to guide next steps.
  • Evaluation against four criteria: Correctness, Completeness, Clarity, and Quality.
  • Integrates into prompt-improvement pipelines to decide when a result is production-ready.
  • Use cases include code generation, content creation, data-to-text tasks, and educational feedback loops.

Quick Start

Install or run via the CLI: assess-quality --task "Generate a palindrome checker" --output result.xml. Then review result.xml to determine if further iterations are required.

Frequently Asked Questions about assess-quality

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate LLM output quality against a specific task?

To evaluate LLM output quality, you can use a structured mechanism that assesses outputs against task requirements, producing a numerical score and rationale to decide whether further iteration is needed.

How do I automate prompt iteration using an LLM quality threshold?

You can automate prompt iteration by applying a quality threshold to LLM outputs. The evaluation produces an XML verdict with a 0.0-1.0 score, which can be used in pipelines to decide if a result is production-ready.

What criteria are used to assess LLM correctness and completeness?

Assessing LLM correctness and completeness involves evaluating outputs against four criteria: Correctness, Completeness, Clarity, and Quality. This rubric ensures a structured score and rationale for the generated text.

Can I use automated quality scoring for code generation and data-to-text tasks?

Yes, automated quality scoring applies to code generation, content creation, and data-to-text tasks. It evaluates the LLM output against your specified task and outputs a structured XML verdict suitable for automation.

What is the best way to run an LLM quality assessment via CLI?

The best way to run an LLM quality assessment via CLI is by executing a command with your task and output parameters, which generates an XML file containing the score and verdict to review if further iterations are required.