asset-placement-gate

Route proposed AI assets to storage locations using a 4-criteria evaluation framework.

7|Updated May 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harness --skill asset-placement-gate
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: asset-placement-gate
Source: https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harness/tree/main/plugins/fh-meta/skills/asset-placement-gate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harness --skill asset-placement-gate

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Users often struggle to decide where to store newly created AI assets (skills, plugins, agents) — whether they belong in the shared forge-harness meta-skill library for cross-project use, as a project-local agent for team-specific workflows, or are not needed at all. This skill eliminates that guesswork with a structured, consistent evaluation process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 4-Criteria FH Meta-Skill Evaluation: Checks if an asset has cross-project value, acts as an orchestration/judgment layer, can't be replaced by built-in tools, and has no overlap with existing FH skills.
  • Project-Local Fallback Assessment: For assets that don't qualify as FH meta-skills, it evaluates if they have project-specific knowledge, are part of a repeated workflow, or offer local-context convenience.
  • Duplicate Prevention Pre-Scan: Runs a mechanical grep check before LLM evaluation to catch verbatim name/trigger overlaps with existing skills, reducing false positives from duplicate assets.
  • Use Case: If you build a new agent for your team's internal Jira ticket creation workflow, this skill will tell you if it's generic enough to share across all your projects as an FH skill, or if it's tied to your team's specific Jira setup so it should stay as a project-local agent.

Quick Start

Use the asset-placement-gate skill to evaluate where your new internal documentation summarization agent should be placed.

Frequently Asked Questions about asset-placement-gate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I decide where to place new AI assets like agents and plugins?

To decide where to place new AI assets, you can use a structured evaluation framework to determine if they belong in a cross-project meta-skill library or as project-local agents. This eliminates ad-hoc placement decisions by applying uniform placement governance.

What is the best way to prevent duplicate skill creation in an AI project portfolio?

The best way to prevent duplicate skill creation is to run a mechanical overlap pre-scan before LLM evaluation. This grep check catches verbatim name and trigger overlaps with existing skills, reducing false positives from duplicate assets.

When should I keep an AI agent as a project-local asset instead of promoting it to a shared library?

You should keep an AI agent as a project-local asset when it has project-specific knowledge, is part of a repeated workflow, or offers local-context convenience. This project-local fallback assessment applies to assets that do not qualify as cross-project meta-skills.

How does a forge-harness meta-skill evaluation framework work?

A forge-harness meta-skill evaluation framework applies a 4-criteria check to see if an asset has cross-project value, acts as an orchestration layer, cannot be replaced by built-in tools, and has no overlap with existing skills.

Can I use asset placement governance for team-specific workflows like internal Jira ticket creation?

Yes, you can use asset placement governance for team-specific workflows like internal Jira ticket creation. The evaluation will determine if the agent is generic enough to share across projects or tied to your team's specific setup as a project-local agent.