attention-design-review

Review human-facing system signals to reduce alert fatigue and align interruptions with importance.

2|Updated Apr 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/NlightNFotis/skills --skill attention-design-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: attention-design-review
Source: https://github.com/NlightNFotis/skills/tree/main/attention-design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/NlightNFotis/skills --skill attention-design-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you review how a product, interface, or CLI competes for human attention so important signals are noticed, low-value interruptions are reduced, and users are not trained to ignore warnings.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Signal Inventory and Classification: Catalogs notifications, prompts, logs, banners, modals, and status indicators, then maps each to alert, awareness, or decision-support roles.
  • Interruption and Salience Review: Evaluates whether severity, urgency, and actionability are matched to the right channel and whether the most attention-grabbing message is truly the most important.
  • Accessibility and Habituation Audit: Flags color-only or sound-only signaling, repeated low-value alerts, redundant multi-channel messages, and warning patterns that cause users to tune out.
  • Use Case: Use it when users keep missing critical warnings, when a dashboard or CLI emits too many noisy messages, or when a design team needs concrete recommendations to suppress, demote, coalesce, defer, or promote signals.

Quick Start

Ask the attention-design-review skill to audit your app's notifications, logs, and warnings for interruption cost, salience, and alert fatigue.

Frequently Asked Questions about attention-design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I reduce alert fatigue and stop users from ignoring critical warnings?

To reduce alert fatigue, review human-facing system signals to align interruptions with importance, urgency, and actionability. Evaluating interruption cost and salience proportionality helps suppress low-value noise so important signals are noticed.

What is the best way to audit notification design for habituation risk?

Auditing notification design for habituation risk involves cataloging alerts and banners to flag color-only or sound-only signaling. Identifying repeated low-value alerts and redundant multi-channel messages prevents users from tuning out warnings.

How do I review CLI output and dashboard logs for interruption cost?

Review CLI output and dashboard logs for interruption cost by mapping each message to alert, awareness, or decision-support roles. This structured evaluation identifies noisy messages and checks if the most attention-grabbing signal is truly important.

Can I use an accessibility review to fix multi-channel message redundancy?

An accessibility review can fix multi-channel message redundancy by evaluating accessible delivery and flagging repeated low-value alerts. This ensures signals are delivered proportionally without causing alert fatigue or relying on a single sensory channel.

What are the limitations of relying on salience proportionality for UX audits?

A limitation of relying on salience proportionality during UX audits is that users may still habituate to warnings if underlying redundancy and interruption costs are ignored. Designers must continuously evaluate channel fit and suppress low-value alerts to maintain signal effectiveness.