audit-code

Audit repository architecture, type safety, and coding patterns with prioritized evidence-backed results.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dthompson-jti/safety-check-app-concept --skill audit-code
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: audit-code
Source: https://github.com/dthompson-jti/safety-check-app-concept/tree/main/.agent/skills/audit/code
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dthompson-jti/safety-check-app-concept --skill audit-code

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Technical code review for architecture and quality helps teams identify deep design flaws, enforce standards, and improve maintainability before merge.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Architectural soundness evaluation and pattern guidance
  • Dependency hygiene checks and guardrails
  • Type-safety validation and edge-case coverage

Quick Start

Run the audit-code skill on a target repository to generate a prioritized, evidence-backed quality report.

Frequently Asked Questions about audit-code

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is an architecture quality audit and how does it evaluate code?

An architecture quality audit evaluates code by checking architectural soundness, verifying type-safety validation, and assessing dependency hygiene to identify deep design flaws and improve maintainability before merge.

How do I perform a pre-merge code review for type-safety and edge cases?

You perform a pre-merge code review by running an audit on the target repository to apply a technical review checklist, validate type-safety, check edge-case coverage, and generate a priority-ranked results report with evidence.

Can I use an automated code audit to check dependency hygiene across modules?

Yes, you can use an automated code audit to check dependency hygiene across modules by evaluating architectural integrity and enforcing guardrails to produce an evidence-backed quality report.

What is the best way to identify architectural soundness issues in a repository?

The best way to identify architectural soundness issues is to run a rigorous code review audit that applies technical invariants and a review checklist to generate a prioritized quality report with concrete evidence.

How are code quality audit findings prioritized and presented?

Code quality audit findings are presented as priority-ranked results with evidence, satisfying technical invariants and applying a review checklist to highlight architecture integrity, type-safety issues, and coding patterns.