audit-code

Audit code against a plan with GPT-5.4 and Gemini final review.

Updated Mar 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Lbstrydom/claude-engineering-skills --skill audit-code-lbstrydom
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: audit-code
Source: https://github.com/Lbstrydom/claude-engineering-skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/audit-code
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Lbstrydom/claude-engineering-skills --skill audit-code-lbstrydom

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Iteratively audit code against a plan using GPT + Gemini final gate to catch drift, ensure implementation aligns with the plan, and surface actionable findings before shipping.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-pass static analysis with context: structure, wiring, backend, frontend, sustainability
  • Ledger-driven suppression and debt capture to reduce noise in audits
  • Supports up to 6 rounds with convergence checks and a mandatory Gemini final review
  • Triggers and commands: /audit-code <plan-file>, --scope options, and round-based workflows
  • Use cases: validating PR changes, auditing specific plan-file paths, and enforcing plan compliance across repos.

Quick Start

Run /audit-code <plan-file> to start the end-to-end audit loop against the plan and trigger the Gemini final review.

Frequently Asked Questions about audit-code

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code audits against a project plan?

You can automate code audits against a project plan by running a multi-pass static analysis that evaluates structure, wiring, backend, frontend, and sustainability to detect drift and enforce plan adherence before shipping.

How does ledger-driven suppression reduce noise during PR review?

Ledger-driven suppression reduces PR review noise by tracking previously identified issues across up to six audit rounds, capturing technical debt, and applying convergence checks to filter redundant findings.

Can I use cross-model review to validate incremental PR changes?

Yes, you can validate incremental PR changes by orchestrating multi-pass audits with GPT and enforcing a mandatory final cross-model review using Gemini to catch implementation drift and surface actionable findings.

What is the best way to enforce plan compliance across multiple software repositories?

The best way to enforce plan compliance across repositories is to trigger scope-based audit commands against specific plan-file paths, applying convergence rules and a final Gemini review gate to ensure implementation aligns with the plan.

Why does my code audit loop require a final cross-model review?

Your code audit loop requires a final cross-model review to provide an independent verification gate, ensuring that multi-pass static analysis findings are validated and implementation drift is caught before shipping.

Are there limitations when running up to six rounds of plan validation?

When running up to six rounds of plan validation, convergence checks are applied to determine if the audit loop has stabilized, meaning further rounds may be suppressed if incremental PR changes no longer produce new actionable findings.