audit-context-building

Analyze code line-by-line to build architectural context before security audits.

1|Updated Jan 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/allanninal/claude-code-skills --skill audit-context-building-allanninal
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: audit-context-building
Source: https://github.com/allanninal/claude-code-skills/tree/main/skills/audit-context-building
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/allanninal/claude-code-skills --skill audit-context-building-allanninal

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the challenge of achieving deep, accurate comprehension of complex codebases before initiating security audits or vulnerability analysis, preventing hallucinations and context loss.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Ultra-Granular Analysis: Performs line-by-line and block-by-block code examination.
  • Systematic Context Building: Applies First Principles, 5 Whys, and 5 Hows at a micro-level to build a stable, evolving mental model.
  • Use Case: Before auditing a smart contract, activate this Skill to meticulously analyze each function, its inputs, outputs, and internal logic, ensuring no critical assumptions or invariants are missed.

Quick Start

Use the audit-context-building skill to perform a deep, line-by-line analysis of the provided smart contract code.

Frequently Asked Questions about audit-context-building

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I build deep architectural context before a smart contract security audit?

Build deep context by applying First Principles, 5 Whys, and 5 Hows at a micro scale during line-by-line code analysis, linking insights from code blocks to functions, modules, and the entire system architecture.

Why does context loss cause hallucinations during vulnerability research?

Context loss causes hallucinations because the mental model becomes unstable. Maintaining an explicit, evolving mental model based on micro-level code evidence prevents missing critical assumptions and invariants.

What is the best way to analyze complex codebases for bugs without missing critical assumptions?

The best way to analyze complex codebases for bugs is to examine code block-by-block, applying First Principles to meticulously analyze each function, its inputs, outputs, and internal logic, ensuring no critical assumptions are missed.

How do I apply First Principles and 5 Whys at a micro scale during code analysis?

Apply First Principles and 5 Whys during code analysis by breaking down each line and block to its foundational logic, asking why and how operations occur, then linking these micro insights to the entire system's architecture.

Does ultra-granular code analysis work for identifying reasoning hazards in smart contracts?

Yes, ultra-granular code analysis works for identifying reasoning hazards in smart contracts by requiring a stable, explicit mental model that evolves with new evidence from line-by-line examination of inputs, outputs, and internal logic.

When should I not use line-by-line code analysis for security audits?

Avoid line-by-line code analysis when needing a quick, high-level overview rather than a deep, stable mental model, as this micro-scale approach requires meticulous examination of every function and code block to prevent context loss.