What problem does it solve?
Audit cogni-copywriting's arc-preservation references against cogni-narrative's upstream arc definitions. Detects missing arcs, heading mismatches, word target drift, technique inconsistencies, localization gaps, and validation rule conflicts (like H2 count rules that would reject valid narratives). Use whenever the user mentions "audit arc sync", "check copywriter arcs", "narrative drift check", "compare arcs upstream", "are arcs up to date", "arc contract check", "will copywriter break on this arc", or any question about whether cogni-copywriting references match cogni-narrative definitions — even if they don't say "audit" explicitly. Also use proactively after cogni-narrative version bumps.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Surface drift: detect arc-definition drift between upstream and downstream references.
- Validation and compliance: verify headings, word targets, techniques, and localization align with upstream contracts.
- Remediation guidance: generate actionable fixes and improved diagnostics for narrative-copywriting cohesion.
- Use Case: When upstream arcs are updated, run this audit to surface mismatches and prevent polish-time rejections.
Quick Start
Run the audit against the repository's arc definitions and preservation rules to surface drift and generate a remediation plan.
