audit-design-system

You audit Figma nodes for design-system drift by rigorously evaluating structural evidence like instances, token bindings, and raw values to identify missing primitives, local overrides, and unbound tokens. This process anchors each issue to concrete Figma structure.

Unbound tokens and missing primitives in a Figma design system occur when nodes deviate from approved components and use raw values instead of shared token bindings. They represent local overrides that drift away from the established design-system structure.

Yes, you can get replacement suggestions for local overrides found in a Figma screen. When a credible match exists, the audit proposes a replacement via a search across the audited design-system library to ensure components are instantiated from approved primitives.

To review a Figma screen for token binding issues and custom frames, you evaluate the structural evidence of the screen to detect missing shared components and local overrides. This ensures interactive controls are instantiated from design-system primitives rather than custom frames.

Yes, the Figma design-system audit reports raw values and instance overrides. It rigorously evaluates structural evidence to anchor each finding of design-system drift, such as missing primitives and unbound tokens, to concrete Figma structure.

The best way to ensure Figma components are instantiated from approved primitives is to audit nodes and screens for design-system drift. This identifies missing shared components and local overrides, proposing credible replacements via a search across the design-system library.