audit-math

To check mathematical proofs for inconsistencies, an adversarial audit workflow analyzes formal environments to identify missing justifications and cross-reference gaps. It systematically reviews definitions, assumptions, lemmas, theorems, corollaries, and derivations for correctness.

Finding cross-reference gaps in LaTeX proofs requires auditing sections containing formal derivations to report reference errors and ambiguous notation. This process ensures correct use of labels and identifies implicit prerequisites in main documents or appendices.

Yes, you can audit an appendix containing formal proofs to surface skipped steps and labeled references that fail cross-references. The analysis operates at the section level across main text and appendices to ensure comprehensive verification.

To start auditing a mathematical document for ambiguous notation, provide the target LaTeX section, such as main.tex. The audit will then identify and flag inconsistencies, implicit prerequisites, and notation errors across the specified content.

Yes, the proof audit covers definitions, lemmas, and corollaries. It applies rigorous verification to all formal environments, identifying missing justifications and ensuring correct cross-references throughout the mathematical document.