audit

Generate severity-labeled audit reports with file and line evidence.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mrsknetwork/nemodev --skill audit-mrsknetwork
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: audit
Source: https://github.com/mrsknetwork/nemodev/tree/main/skills/domains/references/audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mrsknetwork/nemodev --skill audit-mrsknetwork

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Auditing is the quality gate that catches what the executor misses. It provides an independent, systematic review of the codebase against a predefined checklist, delivering findings that are actionable rather than vague suggestions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured findings with severity levels and file/line evidence.
  • Coverage across code quality, security, and architectural compliance for PR reviews, security assessments, and technical-debt evaluations.
  • Generates auditable audit reports suitable for stakeholder sign-off and release readiness.

Quick Start

Run an audit pass on the repository to generate a severity-labeled findings report.

Frequently Asked Questions about audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a structured code audit report for a pull request?

To generate a structured code audit report, you run an audit pass on the repository to produce a severity-labeled findings report. This evaluates code quality, security, and architectural compliance with actionable remediation guidance.

What is the best way to perform a security assessment on a multi-language codebase?

Performing a security assessment on a multi-language codebase requires a systematic review against a formal severity taxonomy. This process delivers evidence-rich findings with file and line evidence to identify risks and provide actionable remediation steps.

Does code review auditing work for evaluating technical debt across different programming languages?

Yes, code review auditing works for evaluating technical debt across different programming languages. It applies a systematic review process to identify structured findings, categorizing technical debt by severity with specific file and line evidence for stakeholder sign-off.

How do I format code review findings to ensure they are actionable for developers?

To format code review findings as actionable, you must structure them with a formal severity taxonomy and include evidence-rich details. Each finding should contain the file, line, code snippet, risk, and specific remediation guidance for the developer.

Can I use architectural compliance auditing to generate reports suitable for release readiness sign-off?

Yes, you can use architectural compliance auditing to generate reports suitable for release readiness sign-off. The audit produces an auditable report output with structured findings and severity levels, ensuring stakeholders can verify release readiness.

What severity taxonomy is needed to evaluate architectural compliance and security risks?

Evaluating architectural compliance and security risks requires a formal severity taxonomy to categorize findings. This ensures that codebase audits deliver evidence-rich findings with consistent risk levels and actionable remediation guidance for technical debt evaluations.