audit-report

Merge mechanical, per-footnote, and cross-footnote findings into a categorized Markdown audit report.

19|5|Updated Jan 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/edwinhu/workflows --skill audit-report-edwinhu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: audit-report
Source: https://github.com/edwinhu/workflows/tree/main/skills/bluebook-audit/lib/skills/audit-report
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/edwinhu/workflows --skill audit-report-edwinhu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the generation of a comprehensive audit report, consolidating findings from multiple analysis layers and presenting them clearly for user review before corrections are applied.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Consolidated Findings: Merges mechanical, per-footnote, and cross-footnote review results with a defined priority.
  • Categorized Issues: Organizes identified issues by type and severity for clarity.
  • Manual Review Flagging: Highlights items that require human judgment.
  • Report Generation: Creates a human-readable Markdown report (scratch/AUDIT_REPORT.md).
  • User Gate: Pauses execution for user review and approval before proceeding to corrections.
  • Use Case: After an automated audit of legal citations, this skill presents a clear report detailing all identified issues, categorizing them by type (e.g., small caps errors, cross-reference issues) and flagging those needing manual verification, ensuring the user approves the findings before any changes are made.

Quick Start

Use the audit-report skill to generate and review the audit findings report.

Frequently Asked Questions about audit-report

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I consolidate multi-layered findings into a single legal audit report?

An audit report for legal citations categorizes issues by type and severity, such as small caps errors or cross-reference issues. It consolidates findings from mechanical checks and AI reviews, then flags items requiring manual verification to ensure comprehensive document compliance.

How do I generate a human-readable audit report for legal citation checking?

After completing an automated legal citation audit, generate a Markdown report consolidating all findings. This report details identified issues, categorizes them by type and severity, and pauses execution to require user review and approval before proceeding to apply any document corrections.

Can I pause document correction workflows to require user approval of audit findings?

Yes, you can pause document correction workflows by implementing a user gate after generating the audit report. This ensures execution halts to require explicit user review and acknowledgment of the categorized findings before the system proceeds with any automated corrections.

How are mechanical citation errors prioritized against AI cross-footnote review findings?

Mechanical citation errors are prioritized over AI cross-footnote review findings by defining a strict consolidation hierarchy. The audit report merges these multi-layered results, ensuring mechanical findings take precedence while categorizing all remaining issues by type and severity for user review.