audit

Identify security vulnerabilities in EVM smart contracts through structured audit analysis.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Tekholms-LW/apertum-skills --skill audit-tekholms-lw
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: audit
Source: https://github.com/Tekholms-LW/apertum-skills/tree/main/audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Tekholms-LW/apertum-skills --skill audit-tekholms-lw

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps developers identify security vulnerabilities in EVM smart contracts before deployment by applying a structured audit process tailored to Apertum.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Security Review Methodology: Guides contract reconnaissance, vulnerability checklist analysis, exploit testing, and severity-based reporting.
  • Automated Audit Workflow: Incorporates static analysis, fuzz testing, invariant checks, fork testing, and coverage expectations for production reviews.
  • Use Case: Review an Apertum DeFi, NFT marketplace, bridge, staking, or token contract to discover reentrancy, access control, upgradeability, and chain-specific security risks.

Quick Start

Use the audit skill to review my smart contract code for vulnerabilities and generate a prioritized security report.

Frequently Asked Questions about audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit a smart contract for security vulnerabilities before deployment?

Auditing a smart contract for security vulnerabilities requires a structured process of static analysis, fuzz testing, invariant checks, and severity-based reporting to identify flaws like reentrancy and access control issues before deployment.

What types of EVM smart contract vulnerabilities can a security audit detect?

A security audit detects EVM smart contract vulnerabilities such as reentrancy, access control flaws, and upgradeability risks by applying systematic vulnerability checklists, exploit testing, and fork testing across DeFi, tokens, and NFTs.

Does this smart contract audit process support Apertum deployments and staking systems?

Yes, this smart contract audit process specifically supports Apertum deployments, staking systems, bridges, and NFT marketplaces by applying chain-specific security risk analysis and vulnerability checklists tailored to those environments.

What is the best way to test Solidity smart contracts for reentrancy and access control flaws?

The best way to test Solidity smart contracts for reentrancy and access control flaws is through structured exploit testing, fuzz testing, and static analysis to generate a prioritized security report with remediation guidance.

Can I use fuzz testing and invariant checks to review upgradeable contracts?

Yes, you can use fuzz testing, invariant checks, and fork testing to review upgradeable contracts, systematically discovering logic and state vulnerabilities to document severity-based findings and remediation steps.

Why do I need static analysis and coverage expectations for a production smart contract review?

Static analysis and coverage expectations are needed for a production smart contract review to ensure systematic vulnerability detection, validate invariant checks, and generate comprehensive severity-based findings documentation before mainnet deployment.