audit

Audit codebases for accessibility, performance, theming, and responsive design issues.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/thiagofelix/medflow --skill audit-thiagofelix
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: audit
Source: https://github.com/thiagofelix/medflow/tree/main/.agents/skills/audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/thiagofelix/medflow --skill audit-thiagofelix

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the detection and documentation of technical quality issues across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns, enabling teams to identify gaps without performing fixes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive diagnostics: evaluates A11y, performance, theming, responsiveness, and anti-patterns.
  • Actionable reporting: generates a scored report with P0-P3 severities and an actionable plan.
  • Context-aware guidance: aligns findings with design and implementation constraints to inform engineering decisions.

Quick Start

Run an initial audit on your codebase to produce a diagnostic report.

Frequently Asked Questions about audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a web accessibility and performance audit on my UI components?

Run an accessibility and performance audit by scanning your UI components to identify technical quality issues. The process generates a scored diagnostic report with P0-P3 severities and an actionable improvement plan.

What is the best way to identify UI anti-patterns across a web codebase?

Identifying UI anti-patterns requires evaluating your codebase against quality criteria across accessibility, performance, theming, and responsive design. This produces a comprehensive audit report documenting measurable issues without applying fixes.

Can I generate measurable quality scores for responsive design and theming issues?

Yes, you can generate measurable quality scores for responsive design and theming issues. The audit evaluates your codebase and assigns P0-P3 severity scores to findings, producing a structured report for engineering decisions.

Does the audit report work for release cycles and design reviews?

The audit report works for release cycles and design reviews by providing context-aware guidance aligned with implementation constraints. The structured output can be consumed by downstream tooling to inform engineering decisions.

What's the best way to document technical quality issues without automatically fixing them?

Document technical quality issues by running a diagnostic audit that detects gaps across accessibility and performance. It identifies and records issues with severity scoring to produce an actionable plan, leaving code fixes to engineers.

Can the audit output be consumed by downstream tooling for automated tracking?

Yes, the audit output can be consumed by downstream tooling. The process generates a structured, context-aware report with measurable criteria and severity scoring, making it suitable for automated quality tracking.