What problem does it solve? Writers need to know whether an article draft is credible, useful, and search-friendly before publishing, but manual SEO and E-E-A-T reviews are inconsistent and often stop at a problem list. This Skill scores a draft against a 100-point internal diagnostic, fixes the fixable content problems itself, and re-checks the revised article without inventing missing facts. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Weighted six-category scoring: Scores experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness, people-first value, and on-page SEO via a deterministic Python scorer that handles not-assessed categories and assessment coverage. - Audit-repair-verify workflow: Runs a baseline audit, repairs editorially fixable issues using sibling writing skills, then re-audits the revised article, stopping after two repair passes. - Fact-safety guardrails: Never fabricates campaign facts, figures, or quotes; unresolved gaps are marked with [VERIFY: ...] placeholders, and wrong-brand boilerplate is flagged as a critical trust risk. - Use Case: A writer pastes a draft OOH campaign article and asks for an SEO review. The Skill returns a publication-ready revised article with a short list of improvements and any facts needing confirmation, or a full twelve-block diagnostic report when explicitly requested. ## Quick Start Audit this article draft against the SEO and E-E-A-T diagnostic, fix what can be fixed, and show me the before and after scores.
