auditing-skills

To audit a Skill.md file, evaluate its YAML compliance, pure XML structure, and progressive disclosure. This process checks required XML tags, constraint strength, and procedural balance to provide actionable findings with contextual judgment rather than arbitrary scores.

A skill audit checks operational effectiveness by reviewing error handling coverage, example quality, and conciseness. It assesses procedural and operational balance, ensuring the skill provides robust, maintainable, and clearly structured operational guidance.

Reviewing a custom skill involves evaluating its progressive disclosure and conciseness by examining the XML structure quality and constraint strength. The audit provides categorized findings like Critical or Quick Fixes with specific locations and suggested remediations.

Yes, an automated skill audit identifies missing required XML tags in your Skill.md. It evaluates the file against established standards for pure XML structure and YAML compliance, delivering detailed remediations to improve reliability.

The best way to get actionable feedback on skill development is to run a comprehensive audit focusing on content quality and XML structure. This yields categorized severity findings with specific locations, ensuring your skill meets code review best practices.

Skill auditing limitations involve relying on contextual judgment rather than arbitrary scores when checking conditional XML tags and error handling coverage. It provides actionable findings, but complex procedural logic may require manual review beyond automated structural checks.