auditor

Map each spec clause to evidence and categorize proof types.

Updated Feb 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Will-Aveva/phoenix-chassis --skill auditor
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: auditor
Source: https://github.com/Will-Aveva/phoenix-chassis/tree/main/.agent/skills/auditor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Will-Aveva/phoenix-chassis --skill auditor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Ensures every spec clause is accounted for and evidenced, preventing uncited assertions and aiding regulatory or standards conformance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Conformance mapping: verify each spec clause against artifacts and record proof types (direct/indirect/none).
  • Evidence management: flag uncited assertions and generate a Coverage Map showing coverage gaps.
  • Use Case: a compliance team audits a product spec and its documentation to certify alignment before release.

Quick Start

Load the official spec and all relevant artifacts, map every clause to supporting evidence, then generate the audit report.

Frequently Asked Questions about auditor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify conformance to an official spec against project artifacts?

To verify spec conformance, you map each spec clause to evidence within your project artifacts. This process categorizes proof types as direct, indirect, or none, ensuring no uncited assertions remain before regulatory release.

What is a coverage map for spec clause auditing?

A coverage map is a structured audit output that visualizes spec clause verification across artifacts. It highlights integration coverage, identifies gaps, flags false confidence from uncited assertions, and provides actionable recommendations for compliance teams.

How do I audit a product spec and related documents to prevent uncited assertions?

You audit a product spec by loading the official spec and all related documents, then mapping every clause to supporting evidence. This flags uncited assertions and categorizes proof types to ensure complete standards conformance.

Can I use conformance mapping to check integration coverage and gaps before release?

Yes, conformance mapping applies the audit to the spec, plan, and related documents to generate a coverage map. This identifies integration coverage gaps, false confidence, and uncited assertions to certify alignment before product release.

What is the best way to categorize proof types during a compliance audit?

The best way to categorize proof types is to map each spec clause against provided artifacts and label the evidence as direct, indirect, or none. This structured audit output reveals coverage gaps and false confidence in the documentation.

Why does my spec audit show false confidence in conformance mapping?

Your spec audit shows false confidence because conformance mapping flags uncited assertions within the artifacts. By categorizing proof types as direct, indirect, or none, the audit exposes gaps where documentation implies compliance without actual evidence.