auditor-workflow

Executes a comprehensive group audit across connected development phases.

Updated Feb 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nonputtipong/Oryn --skill auditor-workflow
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: auditor-workflow
Source: https://github.com/nonputtipong/Oryn/tree/main/.agent/skills/auditor-workflow
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nonputtipong/Oryn --skill auditor-workflow

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses critical issues missed in per-phase code reviews by auditing entire groups of connected phases, ensuring structural integrity, adherence to project-wide rules, and preventing regressions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Cross-Phase Analysis: Identifies regressions and inconsistencies across multiple development phases.
  • Deferred Item Verification: Checks if issues deferred by code reviewers have been actioned.
  • Plan vs. Implementation: Compares actual implementation against project plans, architectural goals, and security requirements.
  • Use Case: After several developers have completed their respective phases of a feature, this Skill can be invoked to ensure their combined work meets the overall architectural vision and hasn't introduced conflicts or missed critical requirements.

Quick Start

Invoke this skill to audit the group of phases defined in the current context.

Frequently Asked Questions about auditor-workflow

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit connected development phases for structural integrity and compliance?

To audit connected development phases for structural integrity, you can execute a group-level audit workflow that loads project rules, reviews connected phases, and analyzes code reviews to ensure adherence to architectural guidelines and security requirements. This process prevents cross-phase regressions.

What is the best way to verify deferred code review items across multiple project phases?

Verifying deferred code review items across multiple project phases is handled by a cross-phase audit workflow that checks if issues deferred by code reviewers have been actioned. It compares actual implementation against project plans to confirm no critical requirements were missed.

How does cross-phase impact analysis prevent regressions in software engineering projects?

Cross-phase impact analysis prevents regressions by identifying inconsistencies across multiple development phases. It executes a comprehensive audit that verifies deferred items and analyzes code reviews, ensuring combined work from different developers meets the overall architectural vision without conflicts.

Can I use automated compliance auditing to check coding conventions across multiple development phases?

Yes, you can use automated compliance auditing to check coding conventions across multiple development phases. The audit workflow loads project rules and verifies adherence to coding conventions and security requirements, generating structured reports that highlight any deviations or missed requirements.

When do I need to perform a group-level audit instead of a standard per-phase code review?

You need a group-level audit when per-phase code reviews are insufficient to catch structural integrity issues. After several developers complete their respective feature phases, a cross-phase audit ensures their combined work meets project-wide rules and prevents regressions.

Does auditor-workflow require any external dependencies to run regression testing and compliance checks?

No external dependencies are required to run regression testing and compliance checks with this audit workflow. It operates using internal scripts to conduct verification tests and generate structured reports, ensuring adherence to architectural guidelines without needing external libraries.