augment-review

To turn inline code review comments into pull request findings, extract human annotations from your working copy diff and append them as structured findings to a PR review file. This preserves reviewer feedback without manual rewriting.

Extract comments from a git diff by parsing the working copy changes, detecting comment syntax, tracking line numbers, and appending deduplicated findings to an existing PR review file while maintaining consistent numbering.

No, this code review workflow refuses to run if the diff contains code changes instead of comment-only additions. Safety validation ensures only comment annotations are processed before resetting the working tree.

The best way to preserve review feedback before resetting a git working tree is to capture inline source file annotations, validate comment-only changes, and append them to a formal PR review summary for later resolution.

Yes, this PR review tool deduplicates findings against existing review comments. It parses diffs, detects comment syntax, tracks line numbers, and ensures new findings are appended without duplicating existing entries in the review file.

The working copy reset matters because it safely cleans up annotated source files after extracting pull request findings. This preserves the formal review summary while returning the branch to its original state for subsequent development.