auto-naming

Replace generic identifiers with domain-specific names in code.

6|Updated Mar 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Corvalis-LLC/Crow-Stack --skill auto-naming
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: auto-naming
Source: https://github.com/Corvalis-LLC/Crow-Stack/tree/main/skills/auto-naming
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Corvalis-LLC/Crow-Stack --skill auto-naming

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Domain-meaning naming helps developers avoid generic, implementation-focused identifiers by aligning names with business concepts, improving readability and long-term maintainability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforce domain vocabulary: Replace generic names like data, result, or response with domain-specific nouns.
  • Guided refactoring guidance: Promote consistent verb/noun naming patterns and scale names with scope level.
  • Use Case: When adding a feature, rename variables such as order, price_history, or user_input to domain-specific terms like order_record, price_trajectory, or user_request.

Quick Start

Rename identifiers to reflect domain concepts in your codebase for immediate clarity.

Frequently Asked Questions about auto-naming

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I replace generic variable names with domain-specific terms during refactoring?

To replace generic variable names during refactoring, identify business concepts in your codebase and map implementation-focused identifiers to domain-specific nouns. This aligns code with business language, improving readability and long-term maintainability for future development tasks.

What is domain-driven naming and when should I apply it to my code?

Domain-driven naming aligns identifier names with business concepts rather than implementation details. Apply it when creating new features, refactoring, or reviewing code to eliminate ambiguous terms like 'data' or 'response' and enforce semantic, predictable verb-noun patterns.

What's the best way to enforce consistent verb-noun naming patterns across a codebase?

The best way to enforce consistent verb-noun naming patterns is to apply semantic naming rules that scale with scope level. Replacing generic terms with domain-focused nouns ensures predictable patterns, making code significantly easier to read and maintain across teams.

Can I use semantic naming rules to improve code readability for existing features?

Yes, you can apply semantic naming rules to existing features by renaming generic identifiers to reflect domain concepts. Replacing vague variables like 'user_input' with 'user_request' immediately clarifies intent and improves overall code readability without altering functionality.

Why does using generic identifiers like 'result' or 'response' hurt code maintainability?

Generic identifiers like 'result' or 'response' hurt maintainability because they lack domain context, making code ambiguous and difficult to understand. Promoting domain-focused identifiers replaces vague terms with meaningful names, enforcing vocabulary consistency for long-term maintenance.