auto-review-loop

Automate multi-round research artifact review and improvement via Codex MCP.

Updated Mar 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hve4638/hve-cc-marketplace --skill auto-review-loop-hve4638
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: auto-review-loop
Source: https://github.com/hve4638/hve-cc-marketplace/tree/main/aris/skills/auto-review-loop
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hve4638/hve-cc-marketplace --skill auto-review-loop-hve4638

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides an automated, multi-round research review loop that repeatedly reviews a research artifact via Codex MCP, applies fixes, and re-reviews until a positive assessment or a maximum number of rounds is reached, reducing manual back-and-forth in quality control.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Autonomous review cycle: performs sequential rounds of evaluation, generates improvement actions, and triggers re-review.
  • Memory and persistence: stores round history, reviewer notes, and state in REVIEW_STATE.json to enable recovery and resumption.
  • Configurable workflow: supports different difficulty modes, human checkpoints, and compact recovery to adapt to project constraints.
  • Use Case: ideal for manuscripts, proposals, or research plans that require rigorous, iterative quality assurance from initial review to submission readiness.

Quick Start

Start an autonomous review cycle on topic-or-scope by instructing the loop to begin.

Frequently Asked Questions about auto-review-loop

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate an iterative research review loop for manuscript quality control?

An automated research review loop repeatedly evaluates a research artifact via Codex MCP, applies fixes, and re-reviews until a positive assessment or maximum rounds are reached, reducing manual back-and-forth.

What is an autonomous multi-round research review cycle?

An autonomous multi-round research review cycle performs sequential rounds of evaluation, generates improvement actions, and triggers re-review automatically until quality thresholds are met or maximum iterations are exhausted.

Can I resume an interrupted research review process from where it stopped?

Research review processes can be resumed using compact recovery via REVIEW_STATE.json, which stores round history, reviewer notes, and state to enable recovery and resumption after interruption.

Does the automated review loop support human checkpoints during evaluation rounds?

The automated review loop supports optional human checkpoints during evaluation rounds, allowing manual review and intervention between automated review, fix, and re-review stages.

What types of research artifacts work with an automated review and improvement loop?

Complex research outputs such as manuscripts, proposals, or research plans work with an automated review and improvement loop, requiring rigorous iterative quality assurance from initial review to submission readiness.

How to configure the maximum number of rounds for an autonomous research review?

The autonomous research review loop satisfies requirements for configurable rounds, allowing users to set a maximum number of iterations before the cycle stops if a positive assessment is not reached.