auto-review-loop

Coordinate multi-round reviews of research artifacts with structured scoring and Codex MCP.

1|Updated Mar 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Lingrongye/federated-learning --skill auto-review-loop-lingrongye
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: auto-review-loop
Source: https://github.com/Lingrongye/federated-learning/tree/main/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/skills/auto-review-loop
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Lingrongye/federated-learning --skill auto-review-loop-lingrongye

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Autonomous multi-round review of research artifacts to identify weaknesses, implement fixes, and re-evaluate until a positive assessment or a maximum number of rounds is reached.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automates an iterative critique and improvement process for research outputs via Codex MCP.
  • Maintains a structured, auditable log of each review round, decisions, and results.
  • Provides readiness checks for submission and traceable feedback to guide subsequent work.

Quick Start

Provide a topic or scope to begin an autonomous review loop and specify the maximum rounds if different from the default.

Frequently Asked Questions about auto-review-loop

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate an iterative review loop for research artifacts?

An iterative review loop automates multi-round critiques of research artifacts, driving repeated fixes until a positive assessment or maximum round limit is reached.

How do I ensure traceability during autonomous research improvement?

Traceability is maintained by persisting state and logging structured scoring, reviewer feedback, and decisions for each review round.

Does an autonomous review loop work with Codex MCP?

Yes, the autonomous review loop integrates with Codex MCP to generate automated replies and coordinate the critique process.

What is the best way to enforce structured scoring on multi-round research reviews?

The best way is enforcing structured scoring within the review loop, which applies traceable feedback to guide subsequent improvements.

When should I set a maximum round limit for an autonomous review loop?

A maximum round limit should be set to prevent endless iterations when a positive assessment is not reached.