auto-review-loop-llm

Automates an end-to-end ML research review loop with cross-model critique and iterative fixes.

Updated Apr 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jandan138/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill auto-review-loop-llm-jandan138
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: auto-review-loop-llm
Source: https://github.com/jandan138/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/tree/main/skills/auto-review-loop-llm
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jandan138/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill auto-review-loop-llm-jandan138

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Autonomously iterates over research tasks to identify weaknesses in a given ML research artifact, propose fixes, implement them, and re-evaluate until a satisfactory score or predefined rounds are completed.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • End-to-end autonomous review cycle for ML research outputs (claims, methods, results).
  • Supports multiple external reviewers via MCP chat interfaces for cross-model critique.
  • Persists progress with ROUND reviews and logs to a central file.

Quick Start

Initiate the autonomous review loop on the current project by enabling an external reviewer via the llm-chat MCP and setting the review scope.

Frequently Asked Questions about auto-review-loop-llm

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate the ML research review process end-to-end?

You can automate the ML research review process by running an autonomous loop that coordinates cross-model critiques, implements fixes, and re-evaluates research artifacts until a target score or round limit is reached.

What is an autonomous review loop for machine learning research?

An autonomous review loop for ML research is an automated cycle that identifies weaknesses in research artifacts, proposes and applies fixes, and re-evaluates the results progressively across multiple model providers.

How do I set up an MCP server for cross-model critique in research evaluation?

To set up cross-model critique, you need to configure an MCP server for llm-chat alongside an OpenAI-compatible LLM API, enabling external reviewers to iteratively evaluate and fix your research artifacts.

How does this autonomous loop persist progress between review rounds?

The autonomous loop persists progress by maintaining a cumulative review log, specifically using REVIEW_STATE.json and AUTO_REVIEW.md files to document traceable round-by-round feedback and improvements.

Can I use alternative LLM APIs instead of OpenAI for iterative research fixes?

Yes, you can use alternative LLM APIs. The automated research review loop requires an OpenAI-compatible or alternative LLM API to coordinate cross-model critiques and iterative fixes across providers.

When should I not use an automated ML research review cycle?

You should avoid using an automated ML research review cycle if your project lacks an accessible llm-chat MCP server or if you do not need structured, traceable round-by-round documentation for progressive artifact improvements.