auto-review-loop-llm

Automates iterative multi-round review of research outputs using OpenAI-compatible LLM APIs with scoring and logging.

2|Updated Mar 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/satsuki-64/MiniAgentWorkflow --skill auto-review-loop-llm-satsuki-64
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: auto-review-loop-llm
Source: https://github.com/satsuki-64/MiniAgentWorkflow/tree/main/.skills/auto-review-loop-llm
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/satsuki-64/MiniAgentWorkflow --skill auto-review-loop-llm-satsuki-64

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible API to iteratively review and improve research outputs.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated, multi-round review workflow that scores, identifies weaknesses, and applies fixes until a positive assessment or MAX_ROUNDS is reached.
  • Configurable evaluation criteria and provider options, including OpenAI-compatible models, with a clear recovery and logging strategy.
  • State persistence and documentation through ROUND logs and review artifacts to support audit trails.

Quick Start

Trigger the autonomous review loop by providing project context and your initial review goals.

Frequently Asked Questions about auto-review-loop-llm

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate multi-round LLM review for research outputs?

Automate multi-round LLM review by initiating an autonomous loop that scores research outputs, identifies weaknesses, and applies fixes until a positive assessment or maximum rounds is reached. The workflow integrates with OpenAI-compatible APIs.

Can I use an OpenAI-compatible API to iteratively improve research quality?

Yes, you can use any OpenAI-compatible API to iteratively improve research quality. The review loop evaluates outputs against configurable criteria, applies fixes, and logs state across multiple rounds to ensure structured evaluation.

How does state persistence work in an autonomous research review loop?

State persistence in an autonomous research review loop works by saving ROUND logs and review artifacts. This creates a traceable audit trail documenting the scoring, fixes, and evaluation criteria applied across each configurable review round.

What is the best way to structure evaluation criteria for automated LLM research audits?

The best way to structure evaluation criteria for automated LLM research audits is to define configurable parameters that the autonomous loop uses to score outputs, identify weaknesses, and apply fixes. This ensures structured evaluation and traceable documentation.

Does MCP integration support traceable documentation for LLM review workflows?

Yes, MCP integration supports traceable documentation for LLM review workflows. It enables state persistence through ROUND logs and review artifacts, ensuring a clear recovery and logging strategy across multiple configurable review rounds.

What happens when a research review loop reaches MAX_ROUNDS without a positive assessment?

When a research review loop reaches MAX_ROUNDS without a positive assessment, the automated multi-round workflow stops. It applies a clear recovery and logging strategy, preserving state persistence and review artifacts for audit purposes.