What problem does it solve?
Manually iterating research paper reviews, addressing weaknesses, and re-submitting for top-tier conferences like MICCAI, NeurIPS, or ICML is extremely time-consuming and often lacks consistent, rigorous feedback from senior reviewers.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Autonomous Multi-Round Review Loop: Uses the MiniMax API to get senior ML researcher feedback, automatically implements fixes for identified weaknesses, runs required experiments, and re-reviews until the paper meets submission standards or the maximum round limit is reached.
- State Persistence: Survives context compaction by saving loop state to a JSON file, so long-running review cycles can be resumed without losing progress.
- Flexible API Integration: Supports both MCP tool and curl fallback for MiniMax API calls, with no dependency on Codex MCP.
- Use Case: A researcher submitting a vertebrae segmentation paper to MICCAI 2025 can use this skill to get iterative, constructive feedback, implement fixes for model weaknesses, and receive a clear readiness verdict for submission.
Quick Start
Use the auto-review-loop-minimax skill to run an autonomous review loop for your MICCAI 2025 vertebrae segmentation paper to get iterative feedback and fixes until it is ready for submission.