auto-review-loop

Run iterative research review loops with reviewer scores and verdicts.

1|1|Updated May 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zhuyingqin/ARIS-WEB --skill auto-review-loop-zhuyingqin
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: auto-review-loop
Source: https://github.com/zhuyingqin/ARIS-WEB/tree/main/crates/runtime/assets/skills/auto-review-loop
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zhuyingqin/ARIS-WEB --skill auto-review-loop-zhuyingqin

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It solves the problem of getting research accepted by running an autonomous, multi-round review-and-fix loop until the external reviewer decides the work is ready.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated iterative review: Repeatedly sends the current research context to a reviewer (via Codex MCP or direct Codex execution in nightmare mode) to obtain score, verdict, and prioritized weaknesses.
  • Fix-then-re-review execution: Implements the minimum fixes the reviewer requests, reruns experiments/analysis where needed, and continues until reaching a positive assessment or hitting the maximum rounds.
  • State persistence for long runs: Supports compact recovery by persisting round/thread/status in review-stage/REVIEW_STATE.json and reusing prior accumulated review logs.

Quick Start

Use the auto-review-loop skill to review your research topic end-to-end by running: /auto-review-loop "topic".

Frequently Asked Questions about auto-review-loop

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How does automated iterative peer review work for machine learning papers?

Automated iterative peer review repeatedly sends research context to a reviewer to obtain scores, apply minimum fixes, and re-review until acceptance or a maximum round limit. It supports NeurIPS/ICML-style critical scrutiny and experimental-result cross-checking across rounds.

How do I run an automated review loop to fix research weaknesses?

To run an automated fix loop, execute the skill with your topic to obtain reviewer scores, apply requested minimum fixes, rerun experiments, and continue until positive assessment or maximum rounds. State persists in REVIEW_STATE.json for recovery.

Does the iterative research review require Codex MCP?

Iterative research review requires Codex MCP routing or Codex exec for adversarial review. The loop depends on this routing to obtain reviewer scores, verdicts, and prioritized weaknesses.

Can I cross-check experiment reruns across multiple review rounds?

Yes, you can cross-check experiment reruns across multiple review rounds. The loop implements reviewer fixes, reruns experiments, and persists cumulative review logs and state in REVIEW_STATE.json for compact recovery.

What happens when iterative research review hits the maximum round limit?

When iterative review hits the maximum round limit, the loop terminates. It stops applying minimum fixes and re-reviewing if the external reviewer has not reached a positive assessment.