论文内容智能生成工作流 (Automated Academic Content Generation Pipeline)

Generates academic paper drafts from project code and datasets with built-in QA checks.

42|6|Updated Apr 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/BoHeFan/academic-paper-writer-pro-2 --skill automated-academic-content-generation-pipeline
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: 论文内容智能生成工作流 (Automated Academic Content Generation Pipeline)
Source: https://github.com/BoHeFan/academic-paper-writer-pro-2/tree/main/content_generation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BoHeFan/academic-paper-writer-pro-2 --skill automated-academic-content-generation-pipeline

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill converts provided project code and datasets into a structured academic paper draft, enforcing rigorous academic tone while reducing hallucinations through source-of-truth constraints.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Strict academic prompting: Produces formal, objective CS/SE thesis-style writing with mandated formatting (tables and Mermaid diagrams) and explicit instruction to avoid first-person or casual phrasing.
  • Lazy loading & JIT context: Uses directory tree indexing and section-scoped fetching to prevent context overflow in large repositories.
  • Outline-to-draft workflow with mandatory user review: Generates an outline first, then blocks execution for user approval before drafting each stage.
  • Quality assurance & integrity gates: Enforces physical QA checks (character counts, media presence, TODO/empty section detection), an integrity report, and a multi-role self-review with a score threshold before handoff to the next pipeline.

Quick Start

Ask the agent to generate an academic paper draft from your repository and dataset using the content_generation workflow, then stop at the required outline approval step before writing the full sections.

Frequently Asked Questions about 论文内容智能生成工作流 (Automated Academic Content Generation Pipeline)

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate an academic paper draft from my source code and dataset?

To generate an academic paper draft, provide your project repository and dataset to trigger section-by-section thesis drafting. The workflow first creates a structured outline, pauses for your mandatory review and approval, then writes formal academic content while enforcing strict hallucination prevention through source-of-truth constraints.

How does lazy loading prevent context overflow when writing papers from large repositories?

Lazy loading prevents context overflow by indexing the repository directory tree and fetching context just-in-time for each specific section. This section-scoped approach ensures only relevant code and data are loaded into memory during thesis drafting, keeping large-repository academic writing within manageable context limits.

Can I use automated academic writing for large software engineering repositories?

Yes, automated academic writing supports large software engineering repositories through directory tree indexing and section-scoped context fetching. The workflow enforces formal CS/SE thesis-style formatting, including mandated tables and Mermaid diagrams, while maintaining strict source-of-truth constraints to prevent hallucinations.

What quality assurance checks are enforced during automated thesis drafting?

Quality assurance checks during automated thesis drafting include physical validations like character counts, media presence verification, and TODO or empty section detection. The workflow also enforces an integrity report and a multi-role self-review with a score threshold before handing off to the next pipeline stage.

How do I control hallucinations when generating thesis content from code?

Hallucination control during thesis content generation relies on strict source-of-truth constraints derived directly from your provided project code and datasets. The workflow enforces formal academic tone, mandatory user review of generated outlines, and mechanical QA checks to ensure all drafted sections remain grounded in the original repository.

Does automated academic writing require manual review before drafting thesis sections?

Yes, automated academic writing requires mandatory manual review. The workflow generates a structured outline first, then blocks execution for user approval before drafting each subsequent stage, ensuring the final thesis draft aligns with your academic requirements and repository context before proceeding.